share this website Login Account Subscribe Premium Top Stories Supreme Court & High Courts Supreme Court & High Courts Supreme Court All High Courts Allahabad High Court Andhra Pradesh High Court Bombay High Court Calcutta High Court Chhattisgarh High Court Delhi High Court Gauhati High Court Gujarat High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Jharkhand High Court Karnataka High Court Kerala High Court Madhya Pradesh High Court Madras High Court Manipur High Court Meghalaya High Court Orissa High Court Patna High Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Rajasthan High Court Sikkim High Court Telangana High Court Tripura High Court Uttarakhand High Court IBC IBC NCLAT NCLT IBBI Supreme Court High Courts IPR IPR TRADEMARK COPY RIGHT PATENT DESIGN PERSONALITY RIGHTS GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION Supreme Court High Courts GST/VAT/CST GST/VAT/CST GST GST Supreme Court GST High Court GSTAT AAAR AAR VAT VAT Supreme Court GSTAT AAR AAAR CST CST Supreme Court CST High Court GSTAT AAAR AAR CUSTOMS/EXCISE/SERVICE TAX CUSTOMS/EXCISE/SERVICE TAX Customs Customs Supreme Court Customs High Court Customs CESTAT EXCISE Excise Supreme Court Excise Supreme Court Excise CESTAT SERVICE TAX Service Tax Supreme Court Service Tax High Court Service Tax CESTAT More More INCOME TAX Income Tax Supreme Court Income Tax High Court Income Tax ITAT OTHER TAXES COMPANY LAW/LLP/MSME COMPANY LAW COMPANY LAW HIGH COURT COMPANY LAW SUPREME COURT COMPANY LAW NCLAT COMPANY LAW NFRA COMPANY LAW NCLT LLP LLP SUPREME COURT LLP HIGH COURT LLP NCLT LLP NCLAT MSME MSME Supreme Court MSME High Court MSME Commercial Court ARBITRATION Arbitration Supreme Court ARBITRATION HIGH COURT ARBITRATION international arbitration ARBITRATION COMMERCIAL COURT ARBITRATION ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL SECURITIES LAW Securities Law Supreme Court Securities Law High Court Securities Law SEBI Securities Law SAT COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT RERA RERA Supreme Court RERA High Court COMPETITION LAW Competition Law Supreme Court Competition Law High Court Competition Law NCLAT Competition Law CCI MERGER/ACQUISITION COMPLIANCE AND REGULATORY Compliance IBC Compliance IPR Compliance TAX Compliance RERA Compliance Arbitration Compliance Securities Compliance Competition Law REGULATORY Regulatory Income Tax Regulatory GST Regulatory VAT Regulatory CGST Regulatory IGST Regulatory CUSTOMS Regulatory EXCISE Regulatory SERVICE TAX Regulatory OTHER TAXES BANKING/NBFC DEBT RECOVERY LAWS DEBT RECOVERY LAWS supreme COURT DEBT RECOVERY LAWS HIGH COURT DEBT RECOVERY LAWS DRT DEBT RECOVERY LAWS DRAT DIGESTS Digests Yearly DIGESTS Monthly Digests Quarterly Digests Weekly COLUMNS LAWFIRMS INTERVIEWS PMLA/FEMA PMLA PMLA Supreme Court PMLA High Court PMLA Tribunal PMLA Appellate Tribunal FEMA FEMA Supreme Court FEMA High Court FEMA ATFEMA Top Stories Supreme Court & High Courts Supreme Court & High Courts Supreme Court All High Courts Allahabad High Court Andhra Pradesh High Court Bombay High Court Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Gauhati High Court Gujarat High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Jharkhand High Court Karnataka High Court Kerala High Court Madhya Pradesh High Court Madras High Court Manipur High Court Meghalaya High Court Orissa High Court Patna High Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Rajasthan High Court Sikkim High Court Telangana High Court Tripura High Court Uttarakhand High Court IBC IBC IBC supreme Court IBC HIGH COURT IBC NCLAT IBC NCLT IBC IBBI IPR IPR IPR SUPREME COURT IPR HIGH COURT IPR TRADEMARK IPR COPY RIGHT IPR PATENT IPR DESIGN IPR PERSONALITY RIGHTS GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION GST/VAT/CST GST/VAT/CST GST gst Supreme Court gst High Court gst GSTAT gst AAAR gst AAR CST CST Supreme Court CST High Court cst GSTAT cst AAAR cst AAR VAT VAT Supreme Court VAT High Court VAT GSTAT vst aar VAT AAAR CUSTOMS/EXCISE/SERVICE TAX CUSTOMS/EXCISE/SERVICE TAX Customs customs Supreme Court customs High Courts customs CESTAT EXCISE Excise Supreme Court Excise High Court excise CESTAT SERVICE TAX Service Tax Supreme Court Service Tax High Court Service Tax CESTAT INCOME TAX INCOME TAX Income Tax Supreme Court Income Tax High Court Income Tax ITAT OTHER TAXES COMPANY LAW/LL/MSME COMPANY LAW/LL/MSME COMPANY LAW COMPANY LAW SUPREME COURT COMPANY LAW HIGH COURT company law NCLAT company law NCLT company law NFRA LLP LLP SUPREME COURT LLP HIGH COURT LLP NCLAT LLP NCLT MSME MSME Supreme Court MSME High Court MSME Commercial Court ARBITRATION ARBITRATION Arbitration Supreme Court ARBITRATION HIGH COURT ARBITRATION COMMERCIAL COURT ARBITRATION ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL International Arbitration SECURITIES LAW SECURITIES LAW Securities Law Supreme Court Securities Law High Court Securities Law SEBI Securities Law SAT COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT RERA RERA RERA Supreme Court RERA High Court RERA REAT COMPETITION LAW COMPETITION LAW Competition Law Supreme Court Competition Law High Court Competition Law NCLAT Competition Law CCI MERGER/ACQUISITION COMPLIANCE/REGULATORY COMPLIANCE/REGULATORY Compliance INCOME TAX COMPLIANCE GST COMPLIANCE VAT COMPLIANCE CGST COMPLIANCE IGST COMPLIANCE CUSTOMS COMPLIANCE EXCISE COMPLIANCE SERVICE TAX Compliance Other Taxes Compliance Securities COMPLIANCE COMPETITION LAW REGULATORY REGULATORY IBC Regulatory IPR REGULATORY RERA Regulatory Arbitration Regulatory Income Tax REGULATORY GST REGULATORY VAT REGULATORY CGST Regulatory CUSTOMS REGULATORY EXCISE REGULATORY IGST Regulatory SERVICE TAX Regulatory OTHER TAXES BANKING/NBFC DEBT RECOVERY LAWS DEBT RECOVERY LAWS DEBT RECOVERY LAWS supreme COURT DEBT RECOVERY LAWS HIGH COURT DEBT RECOVERY LAWS DRT DEBT RECOVERY LAWS DRAT DIGESTS DIGESTS Digests Yearly DIGESTS Monthly Digests Weekly Digests Quarterly COLUMNS LAW FIRMS INTERVIEWS PMLA/FEMA PMLA/FEMA PMLA PMLA Supreme Court PMLA High Court PMLA Appellate Tribunal PMLA Tribunal FEMA FEMA Supreme Court FEMA High Court FEMA ATFEMA Quick Links Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited STTG Certificate Railway Home / Top Stories / Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere... Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Delhi HC Ruling On GoDaddy Domain Fees Under India-US DTAA Kirit Singhania 31 Aug 2026 11:54 AM IST The Supreme Court on Monday refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court order holding that payments received by GoDaddy.com LLC from Indian customers towards domain-name registration services are not chargeable to income tax in India under the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). A Bench of Justices K.V. Viswanathan and Arun Palli after hearing the parties, refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's order. The Supreme Court was hearing the Income Tax Department's special leave petition against GoDaddy.com LLC , challenging the Delhi High Court ruling that payments received by GoDaddy for domain-name registration services from Indian customers are not taxable in India under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The High Court had also criticised the tax authorities for rejecting GoDaddy's application for a nil withholding-tax certificate under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite existing judicial precedents on the issue. The dispute arose from GoDaddy's challenge to the tax authorities' refusal to issue the nil-TDS certificate for payments received from Indian customers towards domain-name registration services. The Delhi High Court had directed issuance of the nil-TDS certificate and had also criticised the tax authorities for not following existing judicial precedents. Appearing for the Income Tax Department, ASG S. Dwarkanath clarified that the Department was not pressing the merits of the underlying taxability issue. He submitted: “I have not a parallel on the merits, My only contention is that the impugned order is even relieved beyond the prayer in the writ.” He pointed out that the prayer before the High Court was restricted to the relevant assessment year. “Prayer was only for lesser deduction for the year, 2025-26. But to that extent there is no difficulty. But to give it for future, My Lords, is not acceptable.”, ASG submitted. Interjecting, the Court indicated, “The authority is already dealing with the subsequent application under Section 197. It cannot be bound by the direction given in paragraph one, if it comes to a conclusion...” The Bench further indicated that a subsequent application could be considered independently if the tax authorities reached a different conclusion on the relevant tax issues. The ASG reiterated that the Department was not challenging the merits of the High Court's observations on the permanent-establishment issue. He submitted that circumstances could change in subsequent years, including changes in law or other relevant issues. The Court however, questioned why the Department should object to the High Court's order insofar as it related to the particular year for which the application had been made. The Bench observed in substance, that the Department's difficulty appeared to concern the continuation of the relief for future years rather than the decision concerning the particular assessment year. The ASG submitted, “Not just on the PE issue, there are other issues. There could be a change in law. I am entitled to take a relook at the matter.” The Bench responded that there was no challenge to the underlying judicial opinion itself and considered whether the High Court's order could properly be understood as foreclosing the Department from examining subsequent applications. The ASG clarified saying, “I didn't challenge the opinions. Any judgment, as long as it is not immunising the individual verdict, and removing the basic...” The ASG ultimately maintained that his objection was limited to the prospective operation of the High Court's direction and not to the finding concerning the relevant year. The Supreme Court after considering the submissions, refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's order insofar as the dispute before it was concerned.
Curated by Taleb Kabbara · Source: www.livelawbiz.com